Personal Injury Lawyer Blog

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

One Free Bite — Dog Bite Law

Friday, July 8th, 2011

A common misconception in Pennsylvania Dog Bite Law is that the dog and dog owner are entitled to one free bite and cannot be sued for the first bite. This is not at all the law. Our dog bite lawyers understand that general negligence stemming from a dog bite injury has absolutely nothing to do with the how many times the dog has previously bitten, attacked, or injured.

The first time a dog bites someone, the dog owner can be sued under a general negligence theory, including but not limited to and strict liability or negligence per se claims based on the jurisdiction. For example, if your jurisdiction, like Philadelphia, has a leash law. If the bite occurred on a public street in Philadelphia and the dog was not properly leashed, you could sue under a general negligence theory and as a violation of the leash law.

However, in the scenarios presented above, you cannot ask for punitive damages because the dog was not a known dangerous dog. In a sense an argument can me made that this is a free bite because punitive damages are generally much higher then compensatory damages in most dog bite cases.

If the dog has previously bitten,attacked or injured, you can sue for all of the above claims for your dog bite injuries plus punitive damages because the dog is a known dangerous dog. You must be able to show that the dog previously bit or attacked with proof from animal control or another source in order to qualify the dog as a dangerous dog.

Whether the dog has previously bitten only matters in terms of damages, meaning how much money your case is potentially worth.  However, whether there exists a previous bite is irrelevant for establishing liability in a general dog bite case.

share save 171 16 One Free Bite    Dog Bite Law

Am I Limited Tort or Full Tort?

Saturday, June 26th, 2010

The answer to this question is very important. Many times your tort status will determine if you can recover for injuries sustained in a car accident. In Pennsylvania drivers must choose between limited tort and full tort options when auto insurance policies are purchased. The full tort option allows the insured (and the members of the insured’s household) to collect for damages related to pain and suffering in automobile accidents. This is true irrespective of the seriousness of the injury.

If you select the limited tort option you give up your right to sue for pain and suffering unless you suffer a “serious injury.” Under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, a “serious injury” is defined as a “Personal injury resulting in death, serious impairment of body function or permanent serious disfigurement.”

When choosing coverage I always recommend to people that they purchase full tort. The difference in price is nominal in comparison to the value of the right you are giving up by electing for limited tort.car accident Am I Limited Tort or Full Tort?

car accident 300x224 Am I Limited Tort or Full Tort?

Limited Tort or Full Tort?

share save 171 16 Am I Limited Tort or Full Tort?

What rights do crime victims have?

Friday, June 25th, 2010

Many victims of crime believe that their only source for justice is the District Attorney’s office. This is true in one respect. The defendant can only be punished and sent to jail if the District Attorney prosecutes the case. What if someone’s negligence assisted a criminal in committing a crime against you? What if there was a duty of care that an organization failed to deliver that lead to you being the victim of a crime? The answer is that you can recover from them under a variety of tort theories. Crime victims have rights. Far to often these rights are never asserted. I will clarify with an example. Imagine a woman is raped in a hotel room. The rapist gained entry to the room because the cleaning lady failed to lock the window after she was done making the room. Her failure to secure the room and protect the occupant was negligent and the hotel can be held liable for damages associated with the rape. This is true even though the rapist had no association with the hotel and the hotel did not conspire in anyway with the rapist. At Levin & Zeiger LLP we consult with victims of crime and explain what their rights are to determine if a case exists.

Vic Support pic1 300x300 What rights do crime victims have?

Crime Victims Have Rights

share save 171 16 What rights do crime victims have?

Valley Swim Club Update

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

The PA HRC has ruled in our favor.  Yet another victory for the attorneys at Levin & Zeiger LLP.

092409 sswim 400 Valley Swim Club Update

Valley Swim Club - HRC Ruling

share save 171 16 Valley Swim Club Update

Update to Valley Swim Club

Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009

The PA HRC rules on our side.

share save 171 16 Update to Valley Swim Club
Copyright © 2012 Levin & Zeiger, LLP. All rights reserved. Review our disclaimer.
Website by Legal Internet Solutions Incorporated.
The Law Offices of Levin & Zeiger, Ste 1200, 123 S Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19109-1024 v: 215.825.5183 f:215.279.8702